kiki-sainté |
19 days agoHi everyone,
I've been reading for a while and I'm in the same situation, with the post problem in the cdf
3 mod including 2 in training 17 years
(I know you, you're going to tell me yes, but you can change the position, but it seems to me that we're losing potential)
So the idea is to be able to sell (or loan but that's more complicated) 3 players per season
Open a transfer page in the cdf, I put 3 sales per season not more, it will avoid overcrowding in the cdf and to be able to buy players in the right positions
The money collected is either left on the normal account, or we put a sub-account cdf for the purchase and location of our scout and detection of course
The price of the players cdf would be random according to the level (price in connection with the detection)
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Arazosv |
19 days agoIt's not really the same case, the recruiter and the detections you choose what you want, it's you who decided to have 3 🤔
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Marcus Aurelius |
19 days agokiki-sainté |
19 days agoArazosv: Ce n'est pas vraiment le même cas, le recruteur et les détections tu choisis ce que tu veux, c'est toi qu'a décidé d'en avoir 3 🤔
Pour le changement de côté, c'est normal, il doit déjà maitrisé la ligne et le côté pour assigner le reste
I said 3 as I could have said ten it's an example
For the positions you don't have to know all the positions on one side to learn the others
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
kiki-sainté |
19 days agoMarcus Aurelius: La détection tu ne choisis pas ce que tu veux.
Yes, I expressed myself badly, it's an example too, the price can be defined by potential level, a fixed price or something like that
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Marcus Aurelius |
19 days agokiki-sainté: Oui je me suis mal exprimé c est un exemple également le prix on peux le définir par niveau de potentiel un prix fixe ou un truc du genre
I was replying to Arazosv. ^^
The recruiter you can choose the job, not the detection.
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
kiki-sainté |
19 days agoMarcus Aurelius: Je répondais à Arazosv. ^^
Le recruteur tu peux choisir le poste, pas la détection.
Ah ok 👌
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Arazosv |
19 days agoMarcus Aurelius: Je répondais à Arazosv. ^^
Le recruteur tu peux choisir le poste, pas la détection.
In detection, you propose the contract with knowledge of the position, so you choose it
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Marcus Aurelius |
19 days agoArazosv: En détection, tu proposes le contrat en ayant connaissance du poste, tu le choisis donc
No, not as it stands.
Detection is thousands of goats for a guy who has the level. You don't choose the job of the guy who has the level.
To say that you choose the job, you'd have to be more successful in detection research.
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Arazosv |
19 days agoWell, you choose another one that's not as good but with the job you're looking for, it's not complicated🤷
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Jallow |
19 days agoArazosv: En détection, tu proposes le contrat en ayant connaissance du poste, tu le choisis donc
I don't think that's the case! I don't think we're looking for a job in detection, just the one with the greatest potential, and then we offer a contract!
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Marcus Aurelius |
19 days agoArazosv: Ben t'en choisis un autre moins bon mais avec le poste que tu recherches, pas compliqué🤷
Feel free to choose a potential 54 instead of an 80 ^^
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Jallow |
19 days agoArazosv: Ben t'en choisis un autre moins bon mais avec le poste que tu recherches, pas compliqué🤷
Do you? Mdrr
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Demi-cerveau |
19 days agoMarcus Aurelius: Libre à toi de prendre un potentiel 54 à la place d'un 80. ^^
That's really bad faith. Kiki, in his example, talks about 3 mods. When I look at his youth team, there's a potential 78, a potential 72 and a potential 70. I'm not a big fan of detection, but it seems to me that 70 and 72 potentials, with a cdf 10, can be found in a little more than 1 in 10,000. So there's no great difficulty in filling out the squad in this way if there are big deficits in certain positions in the cdf. You can therefore choose positions for this type of potential.
After that, if you want to supplement the workforce exclusively with potential 81s, that's obviously a little more complicated.
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
kiki-sainté |
19 days agoFrankly, I look at potential beforehand when I'm scouting, but at the moment I don't scout any more because I don't have enough good players
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Marcus Aurelius |
19 days agoDemi-cerveau: C'est vraiment de la mauvaise foi. Kiki, dans son exemple, parle de 3 mod. Quand je regarde son équipe de jeunes, Il y a un potentiel 78, un potentiel 72, un potentiel 70. Je suis pas un grand féru de détection, mais il me semble que des potentiels 70 et 72, avec un cdf 10, on en trouve quand même un peu plus que 1 sur 10 000. Il n'y a donc pas de grandes difficultés à compléter l'effectif ainsi si on a de gros déficits à certains postes dans le cdf. On peut donc choisir les postes pour
Don't get carried away with the genius, I'm talking in general about Arasovz's comments and not about Kiki's players.
You can't pick and choose, that's a fact and not bad faith.
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
kiki-sainté |
19 days agoDemi-cerveau: C'est vraiment de la mauvaise foi. Kiki, dans son exemple, parle de 3 mod. Quand je regarde son équipe de jeunes, Il y a un potentiel 78, un potentiel 72, un potentiel 70. Je suis pas un grand féru de détection, mais il me semble que des potentiels 70 et 72, avec un cdf 10, on en trouve quand même un peu plus que 1 sur 10 000. Il n'y a donc pas de grandes difficultés à compléter l'effectif ainsi si on a de gros déficits à certains postes dans le cdf. On peut donc choisir les postes pour
It's obvious that I've stopped detecting 80 potential players 😁 the players I have in my cdf are the ones my scouts have brought me over the last few months
But your debate does not advance for the transfers in the cdf friends
My scout I asked 2 times that he bring me a goalkeeper 2 times he brought mod, there was surely a problem on that side so I no longer ask for a position directly
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Demi-cerveau |
19 days agoSo for the time being, every time I've asked the recruiter to bring me back a specific job, he's always done it. The potential was rubbish, but it was always the job I wanted.
Rather than introducing transfer possibilities into the cdf, I think it would be better if the various positions were available in the free for the cdf, so that a coherent team could be put together or simply to allow newcomers to the game to put together a team in their cdf. Because at the moment, with 9 pages of goalkeepers, the guys who want to put together a team must be in for a real treat ...
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
kiki-sainté |
19 days agoLe problème demi aussi, c'est qu'en irl les joueurs du cdf sont vendables donc un marché des transferts serait logique
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Demi-cerveau |
19 days agoAs far as I'm concerned, that's already the case. When you take a young player out of the cdf and sell him within 24 hours of his release without him having played a single minute for his team, I think that's like selling a player directly from the cdf.
I read a lot about low prices and the transfer market being dead at the moment .... If we start selling players via the cdf, it's not going to get any better in my opinion.
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
kiki-sainté |
19 days agoYou're not going to say that the market is in good shape at the moment either, in 17 years of playing I've never seen anything like it
And everyone thinks it's normal to work their arses off training to sell for less than the initial purchase price
The logic is that I buy a player for 35 million and I train him, so he's stronger and therefore worth more
At the moment you buy at 35M to sell for 15M, but everyone is happy
This game is losing its former glory, prices will really have to go up otherwise if it is to sell 5M a player who was worth 30 5 seasons ago the free market will resume soon and authorized donations because frankly sell for so little for me is donations, so I prefer donations to my agreement
I bought a potential 17 year old 76 last season for 5M and sold him for 2M7 this season. I'm going to sort out my players at the end of the season because there are too many players and if I get 20 to 30M with at least 7 players to sell I'll be lucky apparently
So stop the low market and let's start a new vf era with proper sales
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Flo58 |
18 days agoFor new clubs, the current situation is pretty discouraging! One year that I am back on the game, I discovered some good improvement but also quite a lot of disappointing things, the players with 1 of NG, a number of wounded a little exaggerated or I wonder if I am not in a game of hospital management and the cdf or I must spend 30 min per day to seek the needle in the haystack, I invested on some young people to be trained in the hope of making a minimum of profit to help me to launch but with the fall of the market I believe that I can forget...in short, it reminds me why I stopped playing, 20 years later you're always changing from one day to the next when you're not wondering whether the game has been abandoned. There must be 1,500 active clubs compared to more than 10,000 in 2010, we're clearly regressing, we need to react!
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message